A Western TCM practitioner wrote about pulse diagnosis in P.R. China:
"[i:76d8d43b79]When I was a student in China during that time (in the 1980's), the importance of pulse examination was deliberately played down by many of my teachers and clinical preceptors....I never had a teacher tell me a pulse was anything other than wiry, slippery, fast, slow, floating, deep, or fine...it seems that many modern Chinese TCM practitioners relegate pulse examination to a minor, confirmatory role...[/i:76d8d43b79]" ([b:76d8d43b79]Flaws B[/b:76d8d43b79], [i:76d8d43b79]The Secret of Chinese Pulse Diagnosis[/i:76d8d43b79], 1995 Blue Poppy Press, Boulder, CO. )
There seem to be a disagreement between TCM practitioners as to which pulse qualities are the most important ones.
[b:76d8d43b79]Gao De[/b:76d8d43b79] from the Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine recommends the following list of 16 simplified pulse conditions:
superficial vs. deep;
slow vs. rapid;
empty vs. full;
overflowing vs. thready; and
minute, rolling, choppy, wiry, scattered, hasty, knotted, and intermittent. According to Gao De, "[i:76d8d43b79]mastery of these 16 basic single-feature pulse conditions, together with their possible combinations and their indications, is sufficient to meet the needs in clinical differentiation of syndromes[/i:76d8d43b79]". (These pulses are not exactly the same as the ones described in the Medboo Course B).
In the book [i:76d8d43b79]Chinese Herbal Science[/i:76d8d43b79] by [b:76d8d43b79]Hong-yen Hsu[/b:76d8d43b79] is said: "[i:76d8d43b79]The most important qualities for the physician to be able to differentiation are floating, sinking, slow, and fast[/i:76d8d43b79]." The other four pulse qualities listed in this book are: weak, solid, slippery, and full. (8 pulse qualities in total).
So, my question is:
Which pulse qualities are more important and which are less important for practicing TCM and, in particular, for practicing acupuncture?
Thank you in advance for your answer. |