[quote:dd093f0b0c="David King"]Acupressure used to be a small part of the traditional Chinese therapeutic massage, but it's even more difficult to do it well than do acupuncture. The reason I compare it with salad is because majority of acupressure practitioners nowadays have not grasped the real essence of it. So, it's not a good meal, it's only a salad for most cases.[/quote:dd093f0b0c]
[i:dd093f0b0c]A new randomised controlled clinical trial on the effectiveness of acupressure[/i:dd093f0b0c].
[size=16:dd093f0b0c][b:dd093f0b0c]Treatment of low back pain by [u:dd093f0b0c]acupressure[/u:dd093f0b0c] and physical therapy: [u:dd093f0b0c]randomised controlled trial[/u:dd093f0b0c][/b:dd093f0b0c][/size:dd093f0b0c]
Lisa Li-Chen Hsieh, Chung-Hung Kuo, Liang Huei Lee, Amy Ming-Fang Yen, Kuo-Liong Chien and Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
[i:dd093f0b0c]British Medical Journal[/i:dd093f0b0c] 2006; 332; 696-700
FULL TEXT: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/332/7543/696
[size=14:dd093f0b0c][b:dd093f0b0c]Abstract[/b:dd093f0b0c][/size:dd093f0b0c]
[b:dd093f0b0c]Objective[/b:dd093f0b0c] To evaluate the effectiveness of [u:dd093f0b0c]acupressure[/u:dd093f0b0c] in terms of disability, pain scores, and functional status.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Design[/b:dd093f0b0c] Randomised controlled trial.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Setting[/b:dd093f0b0c] Orthopaedic clinic in Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Participants[/b:dd093f0b0c] 129 patients with chronic low back pain.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Intervention[/b:dd093f0b0c] Acupressure or physical therapy for one month.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Main outcome measures[/b:dd093f0b0c] Self administered Chinese versions of standard outcome measures for low back pain (primary outcome: Roland and Morris disability questionnaire) at baseline, after treatment, and at six month follow-up.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Results[/b:dd093f0b0c] The mean total Roland and Morris disability questionnaire score after treatment was significantly lower in the acupressure group than in the physical therapy group regardless of the difference in absolute score ( - 3.8, 95% confidence interval - 5.7 to - 1.9) or mean change from the baseline ( - 4.64, - 6.39 to - 2.89). Acupressure conferred an 89% (95% confidence interval 61% to 97%) reduction in significant disability compared with physical therapy. The improvement in disability score in the acupressure group compared with the physical group remained at six month follow-up. Statistically significant differences also occurred between the two groups for all six domains of the core outcome, pain visual scale, and modified Oswestry disability questionnaire after treatment and at six month follow-up.
[b:dd093f0b0c]Discussion[/b:dd093f0b0c] This study shows that [u:dd093f0b0c]acupressure is more efficacious in alleviating low back pain than is physical therapy[/u:dd093f0b0c], as measured by pain visual analogue scale, core outcome measures, Roland and Morris disability questionnaire, and Oswestry disability questionnaire. The results support the conclusion of the previous randomised controlled clinical trial on low back pain treated by acupressure. [u:dd093f0b0c]Acupressure may thus be useful for reducing pain and improving body function and level of disability in low back pain[/u:dd093f0b0c].
[b:dd093f0b0c]Conclusions[/b:dd093f0b0c] [u:dd093f0b0c]Acupressure was effective in reducing low back pain in terms of disability, pain scores, and functional status[/u:dd093f0b0c]. The benefit was sustained for six months.
----------------------------------
Sergiy
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2006 12:44 pm |