OK, Sergiy,
It's very good you pasted some of Dr. Zhu Lian's clinical experience.
But it seems you still have some objections on what I said in China Dr. Zhu is not well known in the acupuncture circle, say nothing of the whole circle of traditional Chinese medicine.
In fact, you might ask Mr. Pan Ping, if he's got any idea about Dr. Zhu before our discussion about him. In fact Mr. Pan Ping has been in the field of traditional Chinese medicine for over 20 years.
Now, I think I should say a little more about Dr. Zhu Lian's clinical features.
Dr. Zhu was great to do acupuncture! The reason why I say so is because she had practiced western medicine for quite a long while before doing acupuncture.
You know, at that time, acupuncture or even traditional Chinese medicine was not taken into the publich health system, so acupuncture was regarded more or less as a kind of majic or witch technique, not really a method of medicine. So, as a physician of western medicine, she started to do acupuncture, and took it as a life career, is it very great?
However, this greatness or my personal respect to her won't neutralize her shortcoming or demerits in the practice and training of acupuncture! I have to say so!
First of all, she didn't do differentiation of syndromes, but just some fixed formulas. So, sometimes, she would do too many points, 40 or 50 in one patient, at lease one of her students said so. Don't you think this is a good way of acupuncture? Or the foreign patients would accept this type of needling treatment?
Secondly she didn't recognize the meridians and collaterals, but just the lines and acupoints.
Thirdly, her needling technique i.e. the reinforcing and reducing techbiques were not in line with the traditional ways.
So, from these points, she's been not accepted as a "real" or a conventional acupuncture physician!
From the examples you have listed above, we could see some of her shortcomings.
To treat furuncles or carbuncles, we should pay attention to the color and temperature of and around the skin lesions, so to decide the deficiency and excess, cold or heat, while Dr. Zhu just decide the reinforcing and reducing techniques by whether the pus is out or not.
If it's a excessive and heat syndrome, we'd better not use moxibustion, at least the green hands of acupuncture should be careful in using it.
But Dr. Zhu didn't say anything about it.
Moxibustion would be very good to some chronic cases of the skin lesions, the pus maybe is inside, but it cannot break out, while the skin color is white, so the moxibustion treatment would help.
But I think the surrounding technique could be used, that's no harm at all.
If the differentiation of syndrome is combined with the surrounding method, it would be much more effective. And don't forget herbs.
The Russian version of Dr. Zhu's "New Acupuncture and Moxibustion" helped the spreading of acupuncture in Russia, but also caused some problems, i.e. the Russian acupuncture practitioners don't pay enough attention to the traditional acupuncture in China, neither they know enough of the use acupuncture in China nowadays.
So, that's Yin and Yang!
Ok, I don't want to deny the contribution made by Dr. Zhu in the field of acupuncture, but just try to tell Sergiy the truth why Dr. Zhu is not well known in China.
Hope Sergiy understand me in a right way so don't throw a stone on my head
Tutor |