xuanzhong (GB39)
<p>Hi David King <br />How are you? <br />
In text, and in some books, the olcalization of Xuanzhong (GB39) is posterior of the tibia, but in others books is anterior of the tibia. Why is there this differnce? How is the correct localization? <br />
Best wishes. <br />
Wilson Marino</p>
<p>-----------------------------------</p>
<p><span class="name"><a name="3356"></a><b><font size="2">Wilson</font></b></p>
<p><span class="name"><font size="2"><span class="postdetails"><font size="1">Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 11:42 pm</font><span class="gen"> <font size="1"> </font></font></p> <p>Dear Wilson Marino, <br />
<br />
In fact, the different opinions are from the ancient time. <br />
<br />
Now, according to the State Standardization, the point is located posterior to the tibia, that's the universally accepted official opinion at the moment in China.<br />
<br />
D.K.</p>
<p>-------------------------------</p>
<p><span class="name"><a name="3420"></a><b><font size="2">David King</font></b></p>
<p><span class="name"><font size="2"><span class="postdetails"><font size="1">Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 7:51 pm</font><span class="gen"> <font size="1"> </font></font></p> <p>Tank you David King.</p>
<p><span class="name"><a name="3498"></a>------------------------------------</p>
<p><span class="name"><b><font size="2">Wilson</font></b></p>
<p><span class="name"><font size="2"><span class="postdetails"><font size="1">Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:55 am</font><span class="gen"> <font size="1"> </font></font></p>
Pages:
[1]